Introduction. In this lesson we survey the four gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. We will see why we have four gospels and why they are different. We will also look briefly at each writer, his purpose, and his audience.
I. Matthew and John: We Wrote What We Experienced
In lesson one, we saw that the New Testament is primarily about Jesus. He is the key figure. In this lesson, we look at the four gospels, which are the primary source of information we have about Jesus’s life and ministry while He was on earth. The word gospel means “good news” and is an appropriate name for the documents that proclaim the message of Jesus Christ and His salvation. Two of those gospels, Matthew and John, were written by eyewitnesses. They were with Jesus in person. In fact John began his first epistle by writing, “What we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the Word of Life . . . was manifested, and we have seen and testify and proclaim” (NASB). What a magnificent privilege it was. So when we read John’s gospel, we are reading the record of somebody who was there. It’s the same with Matthew. He could also claim that he didn’t hear Jesus’s teaching from other people. This was his own recollection of a personal experience with Jesus.
II. Mark and Luke: We Wrote What We Discovered
Mark’s gospel was probably written by one of Peter’s disciples and so gives us Peter’s account of Jesus’s life. And Luke tells us that he wrote as a historian. He introduced his gospel by informing us that like the eyewitnesses who wrote their account, “it seemed fitting for me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order, most excellent Theophilus” (Luke 1:2–4 NASB).
Luke was a researcher. He was not a Jew, so he had no ethnic biases. He was not one of Jesus’s disciples, so his version shows us how an outsider saw Jesus.
III. The Synoptic Gospels
Three of the Gospels—Matthew, Mark, and Luke—are called the Synoptic Gospels. Synoptic means to “see together.” Although each gospel presents an accurate record of Jesus, we benefit most when we read them together and integrate their material because some include details others don’t and provide different perspectives on Jesus’s teaching and actions. A richer, deeper picture emerges when you read all three.
IV. John’s Gospel
John is not one of the Synoptic Gospels. John’s gospel is more of a theological treatise. John told us his purpose in John 20:31. “These [things] have been written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name” (NASB). He structured his gospel around seven of Jesus’s miracles and used them as evidence to support his claim that Jesus is God’s Son. Because his gospel includes some material the Synoptics ignore, John adds an essential contribution to our understanding of Jesus’s life.
V. Why Are the Gospels Different?
We read all four gospels to get the most complete picture of Jesus’s life. We would expect them to have many similarities because they’re all about Jesus. But why are they different? Four documents were written about the same individual, and yet we find different events included and even different descriptions of the same events. For instance, the Sermon on the Mount is recorded in Matthew 5–7 and in Luke 6. Matthew’s version is much longer. This is only one of many differences we find as we compare the gospel records. So we ask, “Why are the four gospels different?”
First of all, the four gospels were written by four different people and each writer had his own perspective. Suppose you are writing about an automobile accident. If you asked a policeman what happened, he would probably tell you about how fast the cars were travelling, about missed traffic lights, and other details about driving conditions. If you then asked a physician what happened, he might tell you one driver broke his leg and a passenger in the other car fractured her jaw. These two people are talking about the same event, but each focused on what was of interest. So you have four different writers writing about the same events, but they are still four individuals who noticed things that the others didn’t or may have seen in a different way.
The second reason the Gospels are different is that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John each had different readers in mind. If a new college student wrote a letter to her parents about her college experience, she would tell them how hard she’s studying and how much she’s learning. If she wrote to her friends, she might tell them about the new friends she’s making and the parties she’s attending. If we read her two letters, we wouldn’t accuse her of being inaccurate or dishonest. In fact, because we read both letters we have a better understanding of her college experience. Neither letter is more or less true or accurate even though they are different.
And third, each writer had a different purpose. We would use one set of credentials when applying for a job and an entirely different set when applying for membership on a bowling league. Each gospel writer presented Jesus in a particular way that was of interest to his particular audience. So when we put the four gospels together, we see different writers with their own perspectives, writing to different people and addressing their readers’ interests. We read all four gospels to get a more complete picture of this man Jesus. If we limit ourselves to one gospel, we miss the broader, more sophisticated picture of His person and His mission.
VI. The Gospel Writers
VII. The Gospel Writers’ Audiences
It’s important to realize that although the Bible books were written for us, they were not written to us. God’s messages are timeless, and we legitimately apply their teachings today. But each writer—in both the Old and New Testament—wrote, initially, to an audience in his own time. So the Gospels are also different because of whom they were written to.
VIII. The Gospel Writer’s Purposes
A third reason the Gospels are different is that each writer emphasized a different aspect of Jesus’s person and ministry.
Conclusion
Four gospels. They are very much alike but in some significant ways quite different. John said it’s impossible to capture Jesus’s life in a book: “If everything Jesus did were written down, the whole world couldn’t contain the books” (see 21:25). While you read the Gospels, don’t lose sight of the fact that each of these four men had a relationship with Jesus. He was their Savior. He was their Messiah. He was their King. For Matthew and John, He was also their teacher and their friend. Each knew without doubt that He came to serve them by dying for them. He was God, and He added humanity to His person, because only as the God-man could He accomplish His mission. Only as God’s Son could He save us from our sin. If you’ve not received Him as your Savior, don’t read these Gospels without being struck by the fact that God Himself came to earth, and He died and rose again so that you and I could have a personal relationship with Him. Don’t miss that.